• Login
    View Item 
    •   Eurographics DL Home
    • Eurographics Workshops and Symposia
    • EG GCH: EUROGRAPHICS Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage
    • DH2013 - Digital Heritage International Congress 2013
    • DH2013 - Track 1
    • View Item
    •   Eurographics DL Home
    • Eurographics Workshops and Symposia
    • EG GCH: EUROGRAPHICS Workshop on Graphics and Cultural Heritage
    • DH2013 - Digital Heritage International Congress 2013
    • DH2013 - Track 1
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparing 3D digitising technologies: where are the differences?

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    201-204.pdf (1.915Mb)
    Date
    2013
    Author
    Mathys, Aurore
    Brecko, Jonathan
    Semal, Patrick
    Pay-Per-View via TIB Hannover:

    Try if this item/paper is available.

    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    We tested five 3D digitization systems and one method of 2D+ recording on one object: a human skull from the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences collection (RBINS). We chose a skull because it has both simple and complex structures and different materials such as bone and enamel within the same object. The results obtained with the different technologies were compared for 3D shape accuracy, texture quality, digitization and processing time and finally price. Our results show that the structured light scanner provided the best results to record external structures, CT was found to be the best to record internal structures and is also the best for recording reflecting material such as enamel. Photogrammetry is a very good compromise between portability, price and quality. RTI is a method of 2D+ recording and is a complementary technique, using the same equipment than photogrammetry, which can capture small morphological features that are not easily digitized with the 3D techniques.
    BibTeX
    @inproceedings {DigitalHeritage.2013.6743733,
    booktitle = {Digital Heritage International Congress},
    editor = {-},
    title = {{Comparing 3D digitising technologies: where are the differences?}},
    author = {Mathys, Aurore and Brecko, Jonathan and Semal, Patrick},
    year = {2013},
    publisher = {The Eurographics Association},
    DOI = {10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6743733}
    }
    URI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2013.6743733
    https://diglib.eg.org:443/handle/10.1109/DigitalHeritage
    Collections
    • DH2013 - Track 1

    Eurographics Association copyright © 2013 - 2020 
    Send Feedback | Contact - Imprint | Data Privacy Policy | Disable Google Analytics
    Theme by @mire NV
    System hosted at  Graz University of Technology.
    TUGFhA
     

     

    Browse

    All of Eurographics DLCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    BibTeX | TOC

    Create BibTeX Create Table of Contents

    Eurographics Association copyright © 2013 - 2020 
    Send Feedback | Contact - Imprint | Data Privacy Policy | Disable Google Analytics
    Theme by @mire NV
    System hosted at  Graz University of Technology.
    TUGFhA