Projected Field Similarity for Comparative Visualization of Multi‐Run Multi‐Field Time‐Varying Spatial Data
| dc.contributor.author | Fofonov, A. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Linsen, L. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.editor | Chen, Min and Benes, Bedrich | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-17T09:56:55Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-03-17T09:56:55Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The purpose of multi‐run simulations is often to capture the variability of the output with respect to different initial settings. Comparative analysis of multi‐run spatio‐temporal simulation data requires us to investigate the differences in the dynamics of the simulations' changes over time. To capture the changes and differences, aggregated statistical information may often be insufficient, and it is desirable to capture the local differences between spatial data fields at different times and between different runs. To calculate the pairwise similarity between data fields, we generalize the concept of isosurface similarity from individual surfaces to entire fields and propose efficient computation strategies. The described approach can be applied considering a single scalar field for all simulation runs or can be generalized to a similarity measure capturing all data fields of a multi‐field data set simultaneously. Given the field similarity, we use multi‐dimensional scaling approaches to visualize the similarity in two‐dimensional or three‐dimensional projected views as well as plotting one‐dimensional similarity projections over time. Each simulation run is depicted as a polyline within the similarity maps. The overall visual analysis concept can be applied using our proposed field similarity or any other existing measure for field similarity. We evaluate our measure in comparison to popular existing measures for different configurations and discuss their advantages and limitations. We apply them to generate similarity maps for real‐world data sets within the overall concept for comparative visualization of multi‐run spatio‐temporal data and discuss the results.The purpose of multi‐run simulations is often to capture the variability of the output with respect to different initial settings. Comparative analysis of multi‐run spatio‐temporal simulation data requires us to investigate the differences in the dynamics of the simulations' changes over time. To capture the changes and differences, aggregated statistical information may often be insufficient, and it is desirable to capture the local differences between spatial data fields at different times and between different runs. To calculate the pairwise similarity between data fields, we generalize the concept of isosurface similarity from individual surfaces to entire fields and propose efficient computation strategies. The described approach can be applied considering a single scalar field for all simulation runs or can be generalized to a similarity measure capturing all data fields of a multi‐field data set simultaneously. | en_US |
| dc.description.number | 1 | |
| dc.description.sectionheaders | Articles | |
| dc.description.seriesinformation | Computer Graphics Forum | |
| dc.description.volume | 38 | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/cgf.13531 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1467-8659 | |
| dc.identifier.pages | 286-299 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13531 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://diglib.eg.org:443/handle/10.1111/cgf13531 | |
| dc.publisher | © 2019 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | en_US |
| dc.subject | scientific visualization | |
| dc.subject | visualization | |
| dc.subject | Categories and Subject Descriptors (according to ACM CCS): Human‐centered computing→ Visualization→ Visualization application domains→ Scientific visualization | |
| dc.title | Projected Field Similarity for Comparative Visualization of Multi‐Run Multi‐Field Time‐Varying Spatial Data | en_US |