Case Study: Comparing Two Methods for Filtering External Motion in 4D Confocal Microscopy Data

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLeeuw, Wim deen_US
dc.contributor.authorLiere, Robert vanen_US
dc.contributor.editorG.-P. Bonneau and S. Hahmann and C. D. Hansenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-30T07:36:33Z
dc.date.available2014-01-30T07:36:33Z
dc.date.issued2003en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this case study, we compare two methods for filtering external motion in time dependent volume data sets acquired from confocal microscopy. The pros and cons of a landmark based and a voxel based method are discussed. We show that filtering external motion is an essential first step for the visualization of confocal data.en_US
dc.description.seriesinformationEurographics / IEEE VGTC Symposium on Visualizationen_US
dc.identifier.isbn3-905673-01-0en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-5296en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2312/VisSym/VisSym03/129-134en_US
dc.publisherThe Eurographics Associationen_US
dc.titleCase Study: Comparing Two Methods for Filtering External Motion in 4D Confocal Microscopy Dataen_US
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
129-134.pdf
Size:
1.69 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
Collections
VisSym03: Joint Eurographics - IEEE TCVG Symposium on Visualization