Lange, DevinSahai, ShauryaPhillips, Jeff M.Lex, AlexanderBujack, RoxanaArchambault, DanielSchreck, Tobias2023-06-102023-06-1020231467-8659https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14822https://diglib.eg.org:443/handle/10.1111/cgf14822How do we ensure the veracity of science? The act of manipulating or fabricating scientifc data has led to many high-profle fraud cases and retractions. Detecting manipulated data, however, is a challenging and time-consuming endeavor. Automated detection methods are limited due to the diversity of data types and manipulation techniques. Furthermore, patterns automatically fagged as suspicious can have reasonable explanations. Instead, we propose a nuanced approach where experts analyze tabular datasets, e.g., as part of the peer-review process, using a guided, interactive visualization approach. In this paper, we present an analysis of how manipulated datasets are created and the artifacts these techniques generate. Based on these fndings, we propose a suite of visualization methods to surface potential irregularities. We have implemented these methods in Ferret, a visualization tool for data forensics work. Ferret makes potential data issues salient and provides guidance on spotting signs of tampering and differentiating them from truthful data.CCS Concepts: Human-centered computing -> Information visualization; Human computer interaction (HCI)Human centered computingInformation visualizationHuman computer interaction (HCI)Ferret: Reviewing Tabular Datasets for Manipulation10.1111/cgf.14822187-19812 pages