Miller, JacobBhatia, DhruvPurchase, HelenKobourov, StephenAigner, WolfgangAndrienko, NataliaWang, Bei2025-05-262025-05-2620251467-8659https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.70126https://diglib.eg.org/handle/10.1111/cgf70126We investigate the usability of Euclidean, spherical and hyperbolic geometries for network visualization. Several techniques have been proposed for both spherical and hyperbolic network visualization tools, based on the fact that some networks admit lower embedding error (distortion) in such non-Euclidean geometries. However, it is not yet known whether a lower embedding error translates to human subject benefits, e.g., better task accuracy or lower task completion time. We design, implement, conduct, and analyze a human subjects study to compare Euclidean, spherical and hyperbolic network visualizations using tasks that span the network task taxonomy. While in some cases accuracy and response times are negatively impacted when using non-Euclidean visualizations, the evaluation shows that differences in accuracy for hyperbolic and spherical visualizations are not statistically significant when compared to Euclidean visualizations. Additionally, differences in response times for spherical visualizations are not statistically significant compared to Euclidean visualizations.Attribution 4.0 International LicenseCCS Concepts: Human-centered computing → Visualization design and evaluation methods; Empirical studies in visualizationHuman centered computing → Visualization design and evaluation methodsEmpirical studies in visualization10.1111/cgf.7012612 pages