How Good is Good Enough? The Challenge of Evaluating Subjective Quality of AI-Edited Video Coverage of Live Events
View/ Open
Date
2020Author
Radut, Miruna
Evans, Michael
To, Kristie
Nooney, Tamsin
Phillipson, Graeme
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
This paper reports on recent and ongoing work to develop empirical methods for assessment of the subjective quality of artificial intelligence (AI)-produced multicamera video. We have developed a prototype software system that recording panel performances, using a variety of didactic and machine learning techniques to intelligently crop and cut between feeds from an array of static, unmanned cameras. Evaluating the subjective quality rendered by the software's decisions regarding when and to what to cut represents an important and interesting challenge, due to the technical behaviour of the system, the large number of potential quality risks, and the need to mitigate for content specificity.
BibTeX
@inproceedings {10.2312:wiced.20201127,
booktitle = {Workshop on Intelligent Cinematography and Editing},
editor = {Christie, Marc and Wu, Hui-Yin and Li, Tsai-Yen and Gandhi, Vineet},
title = {{How Good is Good Enough? The Challenge of Evaluating Subjective Quality of AI-Edited Video Coverage of Live Events}},
author = {Radut, Miruna and Evans, Michael and To, Kristie and Nooney, Tamsin and Phillipson, Graeme},
year = {2020},
publisher = {The Eurographics Association},
ISSN = {2411-9733},
ISBN = {978-3-03868-127-4},
DOI = {10.2312/wiced.20201127}
}
booktitle = {Workshop on Intelligent Cinematography and Editing},
editor = {Christie, Marc and Wu, Hui-Yin and Li, Tsai-Yen and Gandhi, Vineet},
title = {{How Good is Good Enough? The Challenge of Evaluating Subjective Quality of AI-Edited Video Coverage of Live Events}},
author = {Radut, Miruna and Evans, Michael and To, Kristie and Nooney, Tamsin and Phillipson, Graeme},
year = {2020},
publisher = {The Eurographics Association},
ISSN = {2411-9733},
ISBN = {978-3-03868-127-4},
DOI = {10.2312/wiced.20201127}
}