Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChuter, Aliceen_US
dc.contributor.authorDevlin, Kateen_US
dc.contributor.editorMarinos Ioannides and David Arnold and Franco Niccolucci and Katerina Maniaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-31T15:14:14Z
dc.date.available2014-01-31T15:14:14Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.isbn3-905673-42-8en_US
dc.identifier.issn1811-864Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2312/VAST/VAST06/187-193en_US
dc.description.abstractThe field of archaeology relies heavily on photography as a way of recording information about sites and artefacts. It is therefore essential that we can have confidence in the photographic record, as any changes over time can result in information being lost forever. In the past five years digital imaging has become a potential alternative to traditional film photography. However, this has great implications, as both methods have very different advantages and disadvantages. Most notably, if the rise in digital photography in the heritage sector mirrors that of current public trends, there is a danger that digital preservation issues could be neglected. We undertook a survey of photographic practice among archaeologists in the UK in order to gain an insight into the prominence of digital photography for recording our past. This paper presents and analyses our results.en_US
dc.publisherThe Eurographics Associationen_US
dc.subjectCategories and Subject Descriptors (according to ACM CCS): J. Computer Applications [J.2 Physical Sciences and Engineering]: Archaeologyen_US
dc.titleCurrent Practice in Digital Imaging in UK Archaeologyen_US
dc.description.seriesinformationVAST: International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Intelligent Cultural Heritageen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record