===================================================================

CGF EMAIL REVIEW FORM

EUROGRAPHICS, the European Association for Computer Graphics

____________________________________________________________________

   Please send this form by email to the CGF Chief Editor who
   requested your review
____________________________________________________________________


Please be sure to put your name on the final page.

Fill out the check-lists below to summarise the paper.  Use the
Information for Authors section to provide detailed constructive
feedback which will encourage authors to improve their paper or, in
the case of rejection, will give authors a clear reason.  Further
confidential remarks may be included in the Information for the
Editors section: that part of the Review Form is confidential and is
the *only* part not disclosed to the author(s).
____________________________________________________________________


Paper Number:
Author(s):
Paper Title:

1. Classification of the paper

Choose one of:
    Research paper (presents innovative research results)
    Technical note (short paper, focuses on a single technical issue)
    Practice-and-experience paper (variants,applications, case studies...)
    State-of-the-art report (reviews recent advances)
    Other (please specify)


2. Does the paper address computer graphics?

Choose one of:
   Yes
   No
   Marginal


3. Originality/novelty

Choose one of:
   High
   Good
   Average
   Poor
   Low

4. Importance

Choose one of:
   High
   Good
   Average
   Poor
   Low


5. Technical soundness

Choose one of:
   High
   Good
   Average
   Poor
   Low


6. Clarity of writing and presentation

Choose one of:
   High
   Good
   Average
   Poor
   Low


7. Clarity and quality of illustrations (if present)

Choose one of:
   Not applicable
   High
   Good
   Average
   Poor
   Low


8.  Do the ACM classification provided corresponds to the paper topic?
    (all papers should be classified using the ACM Computing
     Classification System - ACM CCS, found at http://www.acm.org/class )

Choose one of:
   Yes
   No

If NO (or if the author has not indicated it), please specify
alternative ACM classification:

.............................................................


9.  Should the paper be shortened?

If you recommend shortening the paper, please indicate in the
`Information for Authors' section where the paper should be
shortened, or mark-up and return the paper.

Choose one of:
   Yes
   No


10. Overall judgement

Choose one of:
   High
   Good
   Average
   Poor
   Low


11. Recommendation

Choose one of:
   Accept
   Accept after minor revision
   Accept, but major revisions required
   Major revisions and re-refereeing required
   Reject


Information for the Authors
---------------------------

Please give information to be forwarded to the authors.




------------------------------------------------------------------
Information for the Editors

Reviewer:

This section will not be disclosed to authors.
For submissions to an EG event, please state whether the paper is
appropriate for presentation at that event.




=================================================================